Wednesday, October 19, 2005

A Quick Question

Why would anyone expect a man, who consistently failed, and who has always been bailed out by his family, to be a successful President.

I am not saying it can't happen, just that there isn't any logic in expecting anything but more failure.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I couldn't believe that the Democrats did not push the issue in 2000 and 04.
Talk about leaving a paper trail a mile long!!!!!
I asked my friends who voted for him why they did given the exact record that he had?
Bad Luck was the answer. Any business man who plays with the "Big Boys" gets burned.
They felt his record as governor was more indicative of what he was going to do/ be as president.
By that time, I didn't even bother persuing it!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Is there a polite way to say I told you so

Lynne said...

Actually one other president failed at almost everything he tried until he hit the White House: Harry Truman.

That said, Bush is a waste of DNA.

Jon said...

But Truman was not bailed out, and was forced to learn. Something that most of us do anytime we screw-up.

Bush has never had to live with the results of his failures. While others lost money, he was bought out. While others were left jobless, he was hired for well paying do nothing work.

He was able to fail upward.

kc said...

Remember his first campaign? When Bush said he was going to surround himself with competent people? And people believed him?