Friday, November 11, 2005

How Can You Tell Bush Is Lying?

He is talking

He has started his election style campaign to justify the Iraq war in fine political style, lying his rear end off.


"The stakes in the global war on terror are too high and the national interest is too important for politicians to throw out false charges,"

Or false claims; Like one about mushroom clouds, anthrax, secret meetings, uranium purchases, cooperative terrorist training, and countless other fibs from you and your staff.


they know that a Senate investigation "found no evidence" of political pressure to change the intelligence community's assessments related to Saddam's weapons program.

A half completed investigation, performed by republican party hacks, is a shaky base to build a defense on. We know that Republicans have refused to start 'part 2' of the investigation that was promised in the Summer of 04. Only by closing the Senate was Den. Reid able to get the to Senate to move forward in this.


"More than 100 Democrats in the House and the Senate who had access to the same intelligence voted to support removing Saddam Hussein from power,"

Intelligence polished all nice and shiny by Dick Cheney and the White House Iraqi Group. A group that never managed to bring any of the available evidence forward that might have raised questions about their basic thesis.


"We will never back down. We will never give in. We will never accept anything less than complete victory,"

Of course, in a global war against a battle tactic, can you even define what victory is? I didn't think so.

Bush's war could last a millennia. A new path is needed, and needed quickly.



TAGS

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Not only did the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee Report say there was no manipulation of the intelligence, the Silberman-Robb Report confirmed the fact that there was no manipulation.

The Senate Intelligence Committee has access to the same information that the President does.

Anonymous said...

They also say CIA agents were preshured to change their reports, an interesting conradiction.

The Democrats only allowed that report to go forward with the promise of the part 2 of the inquest, that the republicans have since blocked.

what are they hiding?

Lynne said...

I love cowards who post as anonymous and then misspell their posts. The word is "pressured" not "preshured".

Patently False:
http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/11/iraq-intel/
Disputes the allegation that the Senate had the same access to intel that the White House did.

Jon said...

Great Link Lynne

Thanks